Tabloid Freebies (View original topic)



Aussie

Posted 30 June 2005 - 09:43 AM

'Tabloid freebie going national'. The Australian, on Mark Day and Lara Sinclair, said:

THE free Melbourne commuter newspaper MX is to be transformed into a national brand with local editions in Sydney and Brisbane before the end of this year.

MX, which targets commuters aged 18 to 34 with an edgy, celebrity-led mix of news, sport and entertainment content, is published by the Herald and Weekly Times, a subsidiary of News Limited, publisher of The Australian.
The new editions are expected to launch in Sydney soon, using the editorial production resources of the Melbourne paper.

Media buyers were told two weeks ago that the launch was planned for next Monday, July 4, but it is understood last-minute distribution issues could delay the date. Talks were being held late yesterday between News Limited, Sydney City Council and City Rail representatives and further discussions are likely before the issues are resolved.

According to sources briefed on the top-secret project, each city's edition will share some content, with each having a strong local entertainment component.

News Limited management expects the greater economies of scale resulting from using Melbourne production and content resources, plus a national advertising budget that is tipped to triple with the new editions, will put the paper permanently into the black more than four years after it first launched.

The Melbourne edition is profitable most weeks after posting a 40per cent year-on-year increase in advertising revenue in the financial year ending today.

MX will be distributed at Sydney bus, train and ferry commuter locations used by more than 250,000 people a day. It is understood the Sydney City Council has been consulting representatives of the Melbourne City Council about distribution issues and approaches have been made to City Rail for exclusive access to railway platforms.

Brisbane MX is expected to launch with a similar strategy later in the year.

A big obstacle facing the launch was concern that MX would cannibalise the afternoon circulation of paid Sydney tabloid newspaper The Daily Telegraph.

"The real worry is that The Daily Telegraph still has a very strong core audience of former Daily Mirror readers," a source said. This was also an issue at the time of the Melbourne launch, but it did not affect the Herald Sun. Nevertheless, The Daily Telegraph has been moving to shore-up support among media buyers and this week launched its biggest trade advertising campaign in years.

The Sydney MX is aiming to pull in national advertising revenue of about $4 million a year with a further $3 million annually coming from local retail and entertainment advertising. Sydney media agencies have been briefed on the project.

National bookings, spearheaded by big budgets allocated by telecommunications companies such as Telstra, Optus and Vodafone, have been the main generators of growth for MX. The paper delivers a large hard-to-reach audience in the 18-34 demographic.

"The success of MX vindicates our early bold decisions to target the age demographic rather than commuters and to make it an afternoon, after-work pick-me-up, rather than follow the global model for metro papers, which is morning distribution," a source close to the project said.

News Limited chief executive John Hartigan would not confirm the project yesterday. "We have been updating our business plans since MX was launched in Melbourne," he said. "It has been a great success, well received by a community segment which did not have a newspaper reading habit. They have a high disposable income, are young and therefore highly desirable to advertisers."

The head of HWT, Julian Clarke, would not comment on expansion plans for MX but he has previously said the model was transferable to other cities. He described the product as "a brand for a young market".

MX launched in February 2001 in a pitched battle against Fairfax's early morning free commuter giveaway Melbourne Express, which closed seven months later after failing to stem its losses.

Fairfax has been considering its options in the face of the imminent launch. It has reportedly been in talks with the Swedish Metro Group, pioneers of free commuter papers, about a possible joint venture. But any large-scale investment by Fairfax would bleed the company of millions of dollars when management has been demanding a $100 million turnaround to its bottom line.

MX reported a Melbourne readership of 144,000, up 4.3 per cent, in May, and is reportedly planning an initial print run of 70,000 in Sydney, to be increased as more distribution points are established.


This certainly is an interesting way to do things. I have noticed many more papers available around and about the place, it must be growing in popularity. I can remember times at Flinders St Station where there isn't a paper to be seen, though many do get left on train seats. ;) I suppose it's better than sticking your feet up there... :P

I guess advertising is the primary revenue, but it probably would be used to slowly sway readers onto buying the Herald Sun.

gregorius

Posted 07 January 2008 - 10:11 AM

I know its only a suburban freebie but must nominate the WESTERN SUBURBS WEAKLY with its mixture of topicality & smug liberalism [principly devoted to emancipating the WASP female] as little less than useful for wiping the dripping from the bottom of a pan.

Validating itself as more than this by appearing to be so concerned for a more humane and female friendly Perth, its mostly privelaged and white and young female editorial staff don't just devote themselves to the uplifting of the WASP sisterhood but yes occassionly they must resort to stories that are inclusive of other types of humanity as well, god bless them.

Though they cover themselves with pernache', like so many of those of a politically correct mentality, scratch just below the surface and what you get is the greasy slithering qualities of the reptillian and in the WSW'lys case you get a pretentious and malignant kind of class bigotry parading as information for the public. Exposing itself as thus via all the expensive real estate ads for as similar privelaged upwardly mobile and usually white.

All pretentions its editorial staff have of this rag being something more were highlighted to me by having had on more than one occassion an article or essay I may have written and sent to them with the purpose of being published refused publication and yet a week or two later an article or story so similar appears only this time toned down into a newly devised form of verbal sterility and written by one of their Waspy male-hating colleagues with a degree in whatever, it borders on copyright infringement.

Plus they've got a hide to be so blatant and cheap about it. -greg hoey

aamslfc

Posted 07 January 2008 - 03:46 PM

Say what?

I know this is stating the bleeding obvious, but is there another paper you can read that doesn't make you as angry?

I stay well away from tabloids (national or free local) with the exception of mX in the weekday afternoon peak.

phileasmann

Posted 10 February 2008 - 05:14 PM

As for ads, I'm surprised to see that MX, a free newspaper, has relatively less ads than my delivered SMH. Fairfax puts so much post-it shit on my Herald, not to mention the skyscrapers as tall as actual skyscrapers. But I agree, MX can't be trusted on it's journalistic integrity, but what do you expect? It's tabloid. It's free crap. If you want paid crap: put Samantha Armytage and a copy of the Daily Telegraph in the same room and you've got 2 whining bitches in there.

gregorius

Posted 25 March 2008 - 02:20 PM

View Postaamslfc, on Jan 7 2008, 03:46 PM, said:

Say what?

I know this is stating the bleeding obvious, but is there another paper you can read that doesn't make you as angry?

I stay well away from tabloids (national or free local) with the exception of mX in the weekday afternoon peak.


Well the australian arts writers really get to me. A letter I sent to them in response to other complainants letters-

"it does'nt surprise me one bit about the oz. Shitty vile crappy intellectual pretentishness. Nothing less nothing more.

Take their arts writers. Like one Elizabeth Wynnhausen. Now is that a name of one just born to hold down a job as a pretentious artsey classical music critic in a rubbishy newspaper shag load of dump like the australian. Really the name Wynnhausen is franco/prussian/jew for plain old winehouse.
Her father used to own and run a pub. Big deal. Get over it Elizabeth. Poor silly pretentious aussie princess now.

And her music critique not the best either. She sure knows her beethovens from her schuberts but silly cow has little else to say and like so many that write on the arts just cover this fact over by sounding verbose and highly snob inclined and way too too pretentious. Wonder if its too much of a comedown for her to do interview with her undisguised and far more honest namesake Amy Winehouse. And a real artist too I might add.

But really classical music in australia is being hamstrung by pretentiousness of this type by especially drivelling snobs like our own non-singing non-playing non-musical old lizzy wine house at the Oz as well others like 'margaret intelligentsia old morning thingy' on abc classical music, -Amy 'listhp' Ayres. And its such a shame.

Frank Campbell is another blowhard from one hole out the other. read him todays Oz and so help me god if the poor supercillious stupid old sodden mop heap had anything really intelligent to say about literature. But going through his diatribe you'd be convinced the man was articulate and not a wastrel loafing dunderhead. Sorry Frank Campbell. But retire and so can you old lizzy from the pub down the road. -greg hoey"