[POWERZONE]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 7:21pm, said:

Well, shouldn't I be in the "Gone and not forgotten" category.

I think you should just get yourself a life and stop trolling websites.

[Selma]

POWERZONE, on Nov 6 2008, 6:53pm, said:

I think you should just get yourself a life and stop trolling websites.

Very true.

But as long as I keep getting good reactions like this, I'll keep it up!

[POWERZONE]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 7:24pm, said:

Very true.

But as long as I keep getting good reactions like this, I'll keep it up!

Well thanks for sharing your secret

Sooooooooo, not too good a day for you was it?

Obama won

What was with "Harold Bishop" anyway?

Did you like the "de'selma"tised golf club comment?

I thought it was hilarious....

This post has been edited by POWERZONE: 06 November 2008 - 04:28 PM

[Selma]

POWERZONE, on Nov 6 2008, 5:56pm, said:

Sooooooooo, not too good a day for you was it?

Obama won

????

POWERZONE, on Nov 6 2008, 5:56pm, said:

What was with "Harold Bishop" anyway?

A way to get around the security, which worked.

POWERZONE, on Nov 6 2008, 5:56pm, said:

Sooooooooo, not too good a day for you was it?

Did you like the "de'selma"tised golf club comment?

I thought it was hilarious....

The mod's didn't - they deleted it within seconds!

[POWERZONE]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 7:32pm, said:

The mod's didn't - they deleted it within seconds!

Yeah, bit of a shame that hey?

What did you actually say ? (I didn't see it - bugger)

[Selma]

POWERZONE, on Nov 6 2008, 7:05pm, said:

What did you actually say ? (I didn't see it - bugger)

Yeah you did - that's why you replied to it! I always get you in!

[POWERZONE]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 7:36pm, said:

Yeah you did - that's why you replied to it! I always get you in!

And I always get you out !!!

[Selma]

POWERZONE, on Nov 6 2008, 7:08pm, said:

And I always get you out !!!

Nah - I always keep getting back!

[POWERZONE]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 7:52pm, said:

Nah - I always keep getting back!

Not for much longer. Each time you're "banned" there goes another email

You are sooooo gone......

[Cyril Washbrook]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 7:15pm, said:

Wouldn't be as much fun that way. It always gets a great reaction - just look at the amount of people that have listed "Selma" in their Mediaspy award nominations in the "Gone and Forgotten category". A bit ironic don't you think!

I'm surprised you're not blaming the lead-in for all those nominations.

-------

By the way... good evening, Powerzone.

[POWERZONE]

Cyril Washbrook, on Nov 6 2008, 7:58pm, said:

I'm surprised you're not blaming the lead-in for all those nominations.

-------

By the way... good evening, Powerzone.

Ahhhh, Good evening.

Don't mind me - I'm just cooking up some troll meat






Let me introduce Harold Bishop, or Maude, Gil, Mona or whatever dumbass name it comes up with next....

This post has been edited by POWERZONE: 06 November 2008 - 05:04 PM

[Selma]

Cyril Washbrook, on Nov 6 2008, 6:28pm, said:

I'm surprised you're not blaming the lead-in for all those nominations.

Hey Minh-Quan, I thought you would be in a good mood now that your hero Obama has been elected.

I just thought it was ironic about the nom's - how can I be "forgotten" and still remembered at the same time?

On the subject of lead in's - they are without a doubt a crucial factor, especially given the modern practice of networks running shows directly into one another.

[POWERZONE]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 8:04pm, said:

Hey Minh-Quan, I thought you would be in a good mood now that your hero Obama has been elected.

I just thought it was ironic about the nom's - how can I be "forgotten" and still remembered at the same time?

On the subject of lead in's - they are without a doubt a crucial factor, especially given the modern practice of networks running shows directly into one another.

So do you want to talk about that "defamation" you supposedly didn't do now???

[Selma]

POWERZONE, on Nov 6 2008, 6:38pm, said:

So do you want to talk about that "defamation" you supposedly didn't do now???

So revealing someone's name is defamation?

[POWERZONE]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 8:15pm, said:

So revealing someone's name is defamation?

Trashing someone's user name 40 times in one night name certainly is....

This post has been edited by POWERZONE: 06 November 2008 - 05:17 PM

[Selma]

POWERZONE, on Nov 6 2008, 7:47pm, said:

Trashing someone's user name 40 times in one night name certainly is....

???

WTF?

Got no idea what you're talking about

[POWERZONE]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 8:19pm, said:

???

WTF?

Got no idea what you're talking about

You are SUCH a liar

You tried to start one account after another using someone's name, everytime it got deleted you started another.

You remember that?

What were some of the user names you were coming out with?

[aamslfc]

Oh dear, I go away for 2 hours and all hell breaks loose.

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 5:53pm, said:

Last time you couldn't take the heat and took off from Mediaspy when I won "The Force" debate....

I didn't take off, I was banned.

In fact, I'll even bold and capitalise it for you. I WAS BANNED.

And unlike you, I accepted it (though admittedly with a lot of kicking and screaming) and didn't create thousands of extra accounts so I could continue to spam the place.

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 5:56pm, said:

Exactly my point - no one listens to 2SM in Sydney, meaning Grant's show has no impact on Alan Jones' show - contrary to what aamslfc thinks.

I suggested, slightly tongue-in-cheek, that Jones might be happy not to have Grant counted in the ratings if your pensioner theory was correct. Hence my use of the word might.

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 6:00pm, said:

All of Grant's callers are from outside of Sydney, meaning he has no impact on Alan Jones.

As PZ already noted, many callers are from within the Sydney Metropolitan region.

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 6:06pm, said:

Name them then...

I don't keep a record of every caller that rings 2SM or any other radio station, and I certainly don't do it just so I can settle petty arguments on some internet forum.

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 6:09pm, said:

He gets them to say that - trust me I know one of the callers who rings regularly and says he is from Redfern, but is actually calling from Tamworth.

Who? You seem to know them and their names, why not name them?

Or is that another stupid theory you've pulled from the book of nonsense?

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 6:09pm, said:

Contrary to what you think, I doubt Alan Jones will be worrying about 2SM anytime soon - 2UE and ABC are his only worries (maybe 2CH as well).

Obviously the tongue-in-cheek nature of my post flew over your head. I doubt Alan actually worries about anyone at the moment - he's impossible to compete with.

POWERZONE, on Nov 6 2008, 6:16pm, said:

The ratings are somewhat flawed anyway. The main reason 2SM doesn't take part is because it costs a lot of money to do so.

The official reason Goldie gave a couple of months ago was that the logbook/diary system was unreliable, but I forget whether he mentioned cost as well. But I'll totally agree - it is a rather flawed system of ratings measurement.

Cyril Washbrook, on Nov 6 2008, 6:58pm, said:

I'm surprised you're not blaming the lead-in for all those nominations.

and welcome.

This post has been edited by aamslfc: 06 November 2008 - 05:34 PM

[Selma]

POWERZONE, on Nov 6 2008, 7:54pm, said:

You are SUCH a liar

You tried to start one account after another using someone's name, everytime it got deleted you started another.

You remember that?

What were some of the user names you were coming out with?

I never tried to start an account with anyone elses name - only "The Simpsons" characters and Harold Bishop.

[POWERZONE]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 8:35pm, said:

I never tried to start an account with anyone elses name - only "The Simpsons" characters and Harold Bishop.

Don't believe ya.

But anyway, what "Simpsons" name will you come up with next I wonder???

Or will you finally grow up and stop playing your stupid little games?

Cant you see there is obviously a community of like minded individuals that you are clearly not being accepted into?

Is this what you cant stand?

When these "individuals" are not responding in a positive fashion to your banter, does this not convince you yet, that you are not welcome?

[Selma]

aamslfc, on Nov 6 2008, 7:03pm, said:

I didn't take off, I was banned.

Yes - banned for refusing to accept that The Force benefits the most from having BS as a lead in.

aamslfc, on Nov 6 2008, 7:03pm, said:

And unlike you, I accepted it (though admittedly with a lot of kicking and screaming) and didn't create thousands of extra accounts so I could continue to spam the place.

Only 30.

aamslfc, on Nov 6 2008, 7:03pm, said:

Who? You seem to know them and their names, why not name them?

I can't - they will miss out on their free CD's!

aamslfc, on Nov 6 2008, 7:03pm, said:

Obviously the tongue-in-cheek nature of my post flew over your head. I doubt Alan actually worries about anyone at the moment - he's impossible to compete with.

Not really - most Sydney radio advertising $$$ goes to 2Dayfm and Nova.

aamslfc, on Nov 6 2008, 7:03pm, said:

The official reason Goldie gave a couple of months ago was that the logbook/diary system was unreliable, but I forget whether he mentioned cost as well. But I'll totally agree - it is a rather flawed system of ratings measurement.

No - I would say its accurate. Just a couple of examples - the current system has captured the huge rise of Hamish and Andy and Kyle/Jackie O in Sydney as well as the rise and fall of 2Gb and 2UE resepctively.

2SM pulled out of ratings due to the embarassment of having some shifts rate below 1000 listeners.

This post has been edited by Selma: 06 November 2008 - 05:54 PM

[Selma]

POWERZONE, on Nov 6 2008, 7:15pm, said:

Don't believe ya.

Prove it.

POWERZONE, on Nov 6 2008, 7:15pm, said:

When these "individuals" are not responding in a positive fashion to your banter, does this not convince you yet, that you are not welcome?

But you keep responding - that's why I do it!

Your the only one that falls into the trap every time!

[POWERZONE]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 8:50pm, said:

Only 30. 300

Fixed your post

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 8:50pm, said:

2SM pulled out of ratings due to the embarassment of having some shifts rate below 1000 listeners.

It was more because it costs a lot of money to enter the ratings

[POWERZONE]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 8:53pm, said:

Prove it.



But you keep responding - that's why I do it!

Your the only one that falls into the trap every time!

You think so?

Everytime I "spring" you, your ass gets burned.

I don't ask you to start accounts - so how can I be the one falling into a trap?

Get the hint 'fur ball', you are not warmly recieved around those parts, so stop continuing.

Rack off and find some mates of your own, who fit your ideology and agendas.

Your certainly most unwelcome!

[aamslfc]

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 7:50pm, said:

Yes - banned for refusing to accept that The Force benefits the most from having BS as a lead in.

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 7:50pm, said:

most Sydney radio advertising goes to 2Dayfm and Nova.

I should hope so. They are commercial radio stations that play more ads than music, and contain a greater and more attractive audience.

Selma, on Nov 6 2008, 7:50pm, said:

the current system has captured the huge rise of Hamish and Andy and Kyle/Jackie O in Sydney as well as the rise and fall of 2GB and 2UE resepctively.

Blind Freddy could tell you as much, and without the aid of a radio diary.

Hamish and Andy are the 'it' boys at the moment, and Kyle and Jackie O have been popular for as long as I've been listening to radio. And no-one in their right mind would listen to 2UE at the moment - full of boring, incompetent and unappealing hosts who really don't have a proven track record of success in talkback radio.

This post has been edited by aamslfc: 06 November 2008 - 06:00 PM